← All Mac Studio models

Mac Studio M1 Ultra

The M1 Ultra Mac Studio runs local models at 800 GB/s of memory bandwidth with 64 to 128 GB of unified memory. On Apple Silicon that memory is shared with the GPU, so the whole pool is available for weights: at 128 GB you can hold roughly a 172B dense model at Q4. Two Max dies fused together: the widest memory bus and the highest capacity Apple sells. This is the tier that runs frontier-size open weights locally.

Apple no longer sells this configuration new. It stays fully evaluated here because the used market is where most of its local AI value now sits.

Specifications

ChipApple M1 Ultra
CPU cores20
GPU cores48 or 64
Unified memory64 or 128 GB
Memory bandwidth800 GB/s
Neural Engine22 TOPS
Released2022
AvailabilityUsed market

Memory bandwidth is faster than 83% of the Apple Silicon chips shipped in a Mac, against a 819 GB/s peak.

Its memory ceiling is above 67% of them, against a 512 GB peak.

Pick your configuration

Every option Apple sells with this chip. The model list below recomputes against the one you pick.

GPU cores

Unified memory

What each memory option runs

Unified memory is the ceiling and it is soldered, so this is the decision you cannot revisit.

64 GB unified memory

56 GB usable for weights · 800 GB/s

3,541 of 3,641 models fit, and 3,385 of them run with headroom rather than as a squeeze.

Largest model at Q4
Kimi K2.6 JANGTQ_3L · 83.44B
Best all-round pick
Qwen3.5 4B · Q8_0 · ~90 tok/s

128 GB unified memory

112 GB usable for weights · 800 GB/s

3,582 of 3,641 models fit, and 3,532 of them run with headroom rather than as a squeeze.

Largest model at Q4
Kimi K2.5 · 171B
Best all-round pick
Qwen3.6 35B A3B · Q8_0 · ~140 tok/s

What a 64 GB M1 Ultra Mac Studio can run

Every model in the database against this exact configuration, at 800 GB/s. Ratings and speeds are the same numbers the model pages show.

Showing 3641 of 3641 models

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-02-27

Q8_0Excellent
5.7 GB9% of RAM~90 tok/sEstimated4.66B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · google · 2026-05

Q8_0Excellent
13.8 GB22% of RAM~35 tok/sEstimated11.96B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-02-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.5 GB2% of RAM~482 tok/sEstimated0.87B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-02-28

Q8_0Excellent
3.0 GB5% of RAM~185 tok/sEstimated2.27B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-02-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.5 GB2% of RAM~482 tok/sEstimated0.87B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-02-27

Q8_0Excellent
5.7 GB9% of RAM~90 tok/sEstimated4.66B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-02-28

Q8_0Excellent
3.0 GB5% of RAM~185 tok/sEstimated2.27B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · jackrong · 2026-03-16

Q8_0Excellent
11.3 GB18% of RAM~43 tok/sEstimated9.65B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-02-27

Q8_0Excellent
11.3 GB18% of RAM~43 tok/sEstimated9.65B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-02-26

Q8_0Excellent
11.3 GB18% of RAM~43 tok/sEstimated9.65B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-04-15

Q8_0Excellent
40.6 GB63% of RAMBenchmark needed35.95B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~358 tok/sEstimated1.17B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
0.9 GB1% of RAM~1,197 tok/sEstimated0.35B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~358 tok/sEstimated1.17B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
9.8 GB15% of RAMBenchmark needed8.3B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
27.1 GB42% of RAMBenchmark needed23.84B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~358 tok/sEstimated1.17B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
0.9 GB1% of RAM~1,197 tok/sEstimated0.35B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
3.4 GB5% of RAM~163 tok/sEstimated2.57B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.3 GB2% of RAM~566 tok/sEstimated0.74B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~358 tok/sEstimated1.17B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
0.9 GB1% of RAM~1,197 tok/sEstimated0.35B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
3.4 GB5% of RAM~163 tok/sEstimated2.57B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
0.9 GB1% of RAM~1,197 tok/sEstimated0.35B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~358 tok/sEstimated1.17B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
0.9 GB1% of RAM~1,197 tok/sEstimated0.35B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~358 tok/sEstimated1.17B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
0.9 GB1% of RAM~1,197 tok/sEstimated0.35B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · alibaba-nlp · 2026-03-31

Q8_0Excellent
9.6 GB15% of RAM~51 tok/sEstimated8.19B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-02-24

Q8_0Excellent
40.6 GB63% of RAMBenchmark needed35.95B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · ibm-granite · 2025-09-16

Q8_0Excellent
8.2 GB13% of RAMBenchmark needed6.94B params
Run with ToolPiper

Chat · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~358 tok/sEstimated1.17B params
Run with ToolPiper

Chat · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
3.4 GB5% of RAM~163 tok/sEstimated2.57B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · ibm-granite · 2025-09-16

Q8_0Excellent
4.1 GB6% of RAM~131 tok/sEstimated3.19B params
Run with ToolPiper

Chat · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~358 tok/sEstimated1.17B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · jackrong · 2026-03-07

Q8_0Excellent
40.6 GB63% of RAMBenchmark needed35.95B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · NCAI · 2025-12-29

Q8_0Excellent
8.6 GB13% of RAMBenchmark needed7.25B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · NCAI · 2025-12-29

Q8_0Excellent
22.4 GB35% of RAMBenchmark needed19.6B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Google · 2025-07-30

Q8_0Excellent
29.5 GB46% of RAMBenchmark needed26B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Google · 2025-07-30

Q8_0Excellent
9.4 GB15% of RAM~52 tok/sEstimated8B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Google · 2025-07-30

Q8_0Excellent
6.2 GB10% of RAM~82 tok/sEstimated5.1B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · HuggingFace · 2025-07-08

Q8_0Excellent
3.8 GB6% of RAM~140 tok/sEstimated3B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · ibm-granite · 2025-09-16

Q8_0Excellent
36.4 GB57% of RAMBenchmark needed32.21B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Google · 2025-06-25

Q8_0Excellent
5.0 GB8% of RAM~105 tok/sEstimated4B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
2.2 GB3% of RAM~279 tok/sEstimated1.5B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
2.2 GB3% of RAM~279 tok/sEstimated1.5B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · NCAI · 2025-12-29

Q8_0Excellent
9.0 GB14% of RAMBenchmark needed7.58B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · NVIDIA · 2025-06-01

Q8_0Excellent
10.5 GB16% of RAM~47 tok/sEstimated9B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
1.0 GB2% of RAM~931 tok/sEstimated0.45B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
2.3 GB4% of RAM~262 tok/sEstimated1.6B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
3.8 GB6% of RAM~140 tok/sEstimated3B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Liquid AI · 2025-11-28

Q8_0Excellent
2.3 GB4% of RAM~265 tok/sEstimated1.58B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · lgai-exaone · 2025-03-12

Q8_0Excellent
3.2 GB5% of RAM~174 tok/sEstimated2.41B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · DeepSeek · 2025-01-20

Q8_0Excellent
9.0 GB14% of RAM~55 tok/sEstimated7.62B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · jackrong · 2026-02-27

Q8_0Excellent
31.5 GB49% of RAM~15 tok/sEstimated27.78B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · LG AI · 2025-07-15

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~349 tok/sEstimated1.2B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · raidium · 2026-06-15

Q8_0Excellent
0.5 GB1% of RAM~20,952 tok/sEstimated0.02B params
Run with ToolPiper

Embedding · taide · 2026-06-12

Q8_0Excellent
0.8 GB1% of RAM~1,397 tok/sEstimated0.3B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba · 2025-04-27

Q8_0Excellent
1.3 GB2% of RAM~559 tok/sEstimated0.75B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba · 2025-04-27

Q8_0Excellent
5.0 GB8% of RAM~104 tok/sEstimated4.02B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · openai

Q8_0Excellent
24.5 GB38% of RAMBenchmark needed21.51B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba · 2026-04-21

Q8_0Excellent
31.5 GB49% of RAM~15 tok/sEstimated27.78B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba · 2025-04-27

Q8_0Excellent
2.8 GB4% of RAM~206 tok/sEstimated2.03B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
5.5 GB9% of RAM~94 tok/sEstimated4.44B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · zai-org

Q8_0Excellent
2.0 GB3% of RAM~315 tok/sEstimated1.33B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba · 2025-04-27

Q8_0Excellent
34.6 GB54% of RAMBenchmark needed30.53B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Google · 2025-03-01

Q8_0Excellent
13.9 GB22% of RAM~35 tok/sEstimated12B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
2.9 GB4% of RAM~197 tok/sEstimated2.13B params
Run with ToolPiper

Coding · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
34.6 GB54% of RAMBenchmark needed30.53B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · datalab-to

Q8_0Excellent
6.4 GB10% of RAM~79 tok/sEstimated5.3B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · prefeitura-rio

Q8_0Excellent
5.0 GB8% of RAM~104 tok/sEstimated4.02B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Microsoft

Q8_0Excellent
5.1 GB8% of RAM~101 tok/sEstimated4.15B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
5.5 GB9% of RAM~94 tok/sEstimated4.44B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
2.2 GB3% of RAM~272 tok/sEstimated1.54B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
1.0 GB2% of RAM~855 tok/sEstimated0.49B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Google

Q8_0Excellent
29.3 GB46% of RAMBenchmark needed25.82B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · openbmb

Q8_0Excellent
2.0 GB3% of RAM~322 tok/sEstimated1.3B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
5.0 GB8% of RAM~104 tok/sEstimated4.02B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · DeepSeek

Q8_0Excellent
2.5 GB4% of RAM~235 tok/sEstimated1.78B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · rednote-hilab

Q8_0Excellent
3.9 GB6% of RAM~138 tok/sEstimated3.04B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
9.0 GB14% of RAM~55 tok/sEstimated7.62B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Microsoft · 2025-04-01

Q8_0Excellent
16.1 GB25% of RAM~30 tok/sEstimated14B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · DeepSeek

Q8_0Excellent
9.6 GB15% of RAM~51 tok/sEstimated8.19B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · bytedance-seed

Q8_0Excellent
9.7 GB15% of RAM~51 tok/sEstimated8.29B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · tiger-lab

Q8_0Excellent
5.1 GB8% of RAM~101 tok/sEstimated4.15B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · DeepSeek

Q8_0Excellent
18.0 GB28% of RAMBenchmark needed15.71B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · Google

Q8_0Excellent
30.1 GB47% of RAMBenchmark needed26.54B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · datalab-to

Q8_0Excellent
1.3 GB2% of RAM~607 tok/sEstimated0.69B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · ibm-granite

Q8_0Excellent
4.3 GB7% of RAM~123 tok/sEstimated3.4B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · DeepSeek

Q8_0Excellent
9.5 GB15% of RAM~52 tok/sEstimated8.03B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · farbodtavakkoli

Q8_0Excellent
5.3 GB8% of RAM~97 tok/sEstimated4.3B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · moonshotai

Q8_0Excellent
18.8 GB29% of RAMBenchmark needed16.41B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · openbmb

Q8_0Excellent
1.7 GB3% of RAM~388 tok/sEstimated1.08B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · farbodtavakkoli

Q8_0Excellent
8.3 GB13% of RAM~60 tok/sEstimated6.97B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · rednote-hilab

Q8_0Excellent
3.9 GB6% of RAM~138 tok/sEstimated3.04B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · hmellor

Q8_0Excellent
1.9 GB3% of RAM~338 tok/sEstimated1.24B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · distil-labs

Q8_0Excellent
0.9 GB1% of RAM~1,197 tok/sEstimated0.35B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · nanonets

Q8_0Excellent
4.7 GB7% of RAM~112 tok/sEstimated3.75B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · trevorjs

Q8_0Excellent
29.3 GB46% of RAMBenchmark needed25.81B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · farbodtavakkoli

Q8_0Excellent
1.8 GB3% of RAM~346 tok/sEstimated1.21B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · reducto

Q8_0Excellent
9.7 GB15% of RAM~51 tok/sEstimated8.29B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
34.6 GB54% of RAMBenchmark needed30.53B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI

Q8_0Excellent
9.9 GB16% of RAMBenchmark needed8.47B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · nanonets

Q8_0Excellent
4.7 GB7% of RAM~112 tok/sEstimated3.75B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · nanbeige

Q8_0Excellent
4.9 GB8% of RAM~107 tok/sEstimated3.93B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · lmms-lab

Q8_0Excellent
5.8 GB9% of RAM~88 tok/sEstimated4.74B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · ibm-granite

Q8_0Excellent
5.0 GB8% of RAM~105 tok/sEstimated4B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · allenai

Q8_0Excellent
9.2 GB14% of RAM~54 tok/sEstimated7.76B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · farbodtavakkoli

Q8_0Excellent
5.2 GB8% of RAM~99 tok/sEstimated4.25B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · ibm-granite

Q8_0Excellent
5.0 GB8% of RAM~105 tok/sEstimated4B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · arliai

Q8_0Excellent
23.8 GB37% of RAMBenchmark needed20.91B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · ibm-granite

Q8_0Excellent
7.9 GB12% of RAMBenchmark needed6.67B params
Run with ToolPiper
Q8_0Excellent
0.5 GB1% of RAM~41,905 tok/sEstimated0.01B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · moonshotai

Q8_0Excellent
18.8 GB29% of RAMBenchmark needed16.41B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · lkhl

Q8_0Excellent
2.7 GB4% of RAM~214 tok/sEstimated1.96B params
Run with ToolPiper

Multimodal · typhoon-ai

Q8_0Excellent
4.7 GB7% of RAM~112 tok/sEstimated3.75B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · jinaai

Q8_0Excellent
2.2 GB3% of RAM~272 tok/sEstimated1.54B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
2.9 GB4% of RAM~197 tok/sEstimated2.13B params
Run with ToolPiper
Q8_0Excellent
5.5 GB9% of RAM~94 tok/sEstimated4.44B params
Run with ToolPiper

Coding · coder3101

Q8_0Excellent
29.3 GB46% of RAMBenchmark needed25.81B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · kristaller486

Q8_0Excellent
3.9 GB6% of RAM~138 tok/sEstimated3.04B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · typhoon-ai

Q8_0Excellent
2.9 GB4% of RAM~197 tok/sEstimated2.13B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Upstage

Q8_0Excellent
9.5 GB15% of RAMBenchmark needed8.05B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · 01.ai

Q8_0Excellent
7.3 GB11% of RAM~69 tok/sEstimated6.06B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · zstanjj

Q8_0Excellent
4.8 GB7% of RAM~110 tok/sEstimated3.82B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · ibm-granite

Q8_0Excellent
4.3 GB7% of RAM~123 tok/sEstimated3.4B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · nvidia

Q8_0Excellent
4.8 GB7% of RAM~109 tok/sEstimated3.83B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · weiboai

Q8_0Excellent
3.9 GB6% of RAM~136 tok/sEstimated3.09B params
Run with ToolPiper

Coding · ibm-granite

Q8_0Excellent
9.5 GB15% of RAM~52 tok/sEstimated8.05B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Alibaba

Q8_0Excellent
9.0 GB14% of RAM~55 tok/sEstimated7.62B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · x-izhang

Q8_0Excellent
4.1 GB6% of RAM~129 tok/sEstimated3.25B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · idea-research

Q8_0Excellent
5.0 GB8% of RAM~103 tok/sEstimated4.07B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · openai

Q8_0Excellent
3.1 GB5% of RAMBenchmark needed2.37B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · paddlepaddle

Q8_0Excellent
1.6 GB2% of RAM~437 tok/sEstimated0.96B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · tristepin

Q8_0Excellent
5.7 GB9% of RAM~90 tok/sEstimated4.66B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · twinkle-ai

Q8_0Excellent
4.8 GB8% of RAM~108 tok/sEstimated3.88B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · Liquid AI

Q8_0Excellent
0.9 GB1% of RAM~1,197 tok/sEstimated0.35B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · pfnet

Q8_0Excellent
1.9 GB3% of RAM~325 tok/sEstimated1.29B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · dream-org

Q8_0Excellent
9.0 GB14% of RAM~55 tok/sEstimated7.62B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · fdtn-ai

Q8_0Excellent
9.5 GB15% of RAM~52 tok/sEstimated8.03B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · nvidia

Q8_0Excellent
9.0 GB14% of RAM~55 tok/sEstimated7.62B params
Run with ToolPiper

Reasoning · nvidia

Q8_0Excellent
9.0 GB14% of RAM~55 tok/sEstimated7.62B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · arcee-ai

Q8_0Excellent
5.7 GB9% of RAM~91 tok/sEstimated4.62B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · openbmb

Q8_0Excellent
1.7 GB3% of RAM~388 tok/sEstimated1.08B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · ibm-granite

Q8_0Excellent
4.3 GB7% of RAM~123 tok/sEstimated3.4B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · baidu

Q8_0Excellent
0.9 GB1% of RAM~1,164 tok/sEstimated0.36B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · jetbrains

Q8_0Excellent
14.1 GB22% of RAMBenchmark needed12.15B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · amd

Q8_0Excellent
2.2 GB3% of RAM~279 tok/sEstimated1.5B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · bytedance-seed

Q8_0Excellent
11.0 GB17% of RAMBenchmark needed9.37B params
Run with ToolPiper

General · menlo

Q8_0Excellent
5.0 GB8% of RAM~104 tok/sEstimated4.02B params
Run with ToolPiper

48-core vs 64-core GPU

Both bins run the same 800 GB/s memory bus, so token generation is the same on either one. The extra cores show up in image and video work, not in tokens per second.

ConfigurationMemory bandwidthMemory optionsModels that fit
20-core CPU, 48-core GPU800 GB/s64, 128 GBIdentical
20-core CPU, 64-core GPU800 GB/s64, 128 GBIdentical

Measured on the M1 Ultra

Nobody has submitted a benchmark on the M1 Ultra yet, so every speed on this page is the formula estimate rather than a measured run. The estimate is bandwidth-driven and calibrated against chips that do have data, which makes it a good guide and not a promise.

ToolPiper contributes a result anonymously when you run the benchmark, and the leaderboard shows every chip that already has one.

Where to go from here

What each step actually changes for local models, rather than which one is newer.

Why unified memory is the number that matters

On a PC the model has to fit in GPU VRAM, which is a separate pool from system RAM and usually the smaller of the two. Apple Silicon has one pool. The M1 Ultra's 800 GB/s bus is shared by CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine, so a 128 GB machine can hand almost all of that to a model with no copy across a bus.

Apple stopped selling this one, which is exactly why it is interesting. The Studio exists for this workload. It carries the widest memory buses and the highest capacities Apple sells, and it runs at full clocks indefinitely. A used M1 Ultra at 128 GB still gives you 800 GB/s and a hard 172B ceiling, and neither number degrades with age the way a battery does.

Common questions

Can the M1 Ultra Mac Studio run a 70B model?

Yes, at 128 GB. A 70B model at Q4_K_M needs about 46 GB including an 8K context, and 128 GB of unified memory leaves about 112 GB for weights once macOS takes its share. At 64 GB it does not fit at any quantization worth running.

How much unified memory should I get with the M1 Ultra Mac Studio?

Memory is the only spec that changes what you can run at all. 64 GB holds about a 85B model at Q4; 128 GB holds about 172B. It is soldered, so this is a one-time decision, and it is the upgrade worth paying for before core count.

How fast are local LLMs on the M1 Ultra?

Token generation is bandwidth-bound, so M1 Ultra throughput scales with its 800 GB/s memory bus. Divide bandwidth by the size of the weights actually read per token to get the ceiling, then expect roughly half of that in practice. A 7B model at Q4 reads about 4 GB per token pass, so the M1 Ultra lands in the tens of tokens per second and a 70B model lands in the single digits.

Is the 64-core GPU worth it over the 48-core on the M1 Ultra?

Not for LLMs. Both bins run the same 800 GB/s memory bus and take the same memory options, and token generation is bound by bandwidth rather than GPU cores. The extra cores show up in image generation and video work, not in tokens per second.

Is a used M1 Ultra Mac Studio still worth buying for local AI?

For inference, the specs that matter do not age: 800 GB/s and up to 128 GB of unified memory are the same numbers today as they were in 2022. A used M1 Ultra at the top memory option usually beats a new base-tier machine at the same price on both. Check the battery and the display, not the silicon.

Run these models on your Mac Studio

ToolPiper downloads, manages, and runs local models on Apple Silicon. Free, and nothing leaves the machine.